Lee Mason traded as fourth authority for Liverpool's conflict with Sheffield United after Brighton debate

The arbitrator won't be partaking in the apparatus at Bramall Lane regardless of an entire an hour and a half of directing at The Hawthorns on Saturday  

Lee Mason has been substituted as the fourth authority for Liverpool's conflict with Sheffield United in the wake of being engaged with a disputable occurrence during Brighton's destruction at West Brom on Saturday. 

Artisan filled in as the official for the game at The Hawthorns on Saturday, which finished in a 1-0 triumph for the Baggies. 

Seagulls manager Graham Potter was left astounded after the 49-year-old precluded an objective for the guests in the primary half, and he has now been removed from the administering list for Liverpool's excursion to Bramall Lane on Sunday. 

Editors' Picks 

• Preferable late over never: Willian at long last shows Arsenal what they've been sitting tight for 

• Ramos, Varane and the likely answers for Manchester United's middle back issues 

• Fati, Pedri, Reyna and now Saka: Arsenal pro adds his name to the rundown of football's growing whizzes

Who has stepped in for Mason?  

Bricklayer was expected to be the fourth authority for Sheffield United's home installation, anyway the Premier League have delivered an authority explanation which names John Brooks in the job. 

Jonathan Moss will arrange as the head arbitrator, while Marc Perry and Dan Robathan will be on the touchlines as his colleagues. 

It has been accounted for that Mason has removed from the game subsequent to getting a physical issue during West Brom's success over Brighton. 

For what reason did Mason preclude Brighton's objective? 

He appeared to affirm that Brighton could take a brisk free-kick by blowing his whistle, with Lewis Dunk in this way terminating into the net while West Brom goalkeeper Sam Johnstone was all the while collecting his divider. 

Notwithstanding, Mason blew his whistle again not long before the ball went too far, and refused the objective. 

To add to the disarray, Mason at that point seemed to adjust his perspective and grant the objective before it got alluded to VAR, which saw it precluded once more. 

Dunk was enraged with the choice, saying after the game: "It's humiliating, it's an awful choice. 

"I said to the ref, 'would i be able to take it?' He blew his whistle and I took it. Since there was such a lot of pressing factor from the seat. For what reason doesn't he come and address the press like me? Never, they take cover behind their air pocket. 

"I don't think he understood what he was doing. He gave the objective, for what reason did he give it? I don't have a clue why VAR was getting included, he said 'objective'. 

Harmed Henderson actually has compelling task to carry out - Klopp 

Article proceeds beneath  

What did Potter say? 

The Brighton manager revealed to Sky Sports of Mason's choice: "Supposedly, Lewis Dunk requested to take the free-kick rapidly and the official said yes. In the middle of that there was another whistle. I don't have the foggiest idea what that whistle was for. It would be pleasant for a touch more explanation. I don't have the foggiest idea what the subsequent whistle is for. I don't get that. 

"The disarray is on the pitch and it deteriorates when somebody outside this region is settling on the choices. What will be will be, we've not encouraged ourselves so I can't put everything down to that [disallowed goal]."